So far in the course we have dealt with simplex words, i.e. words whose structure can be defined by the following rules (for English - this does not apply to morphosyntactically more complex languages):
The distinction ``simplex'' vs. `complex', the latter meaning ``derived'' or ``compound'', is a syntagmatic criterion for classifying nouns according to their internal morphological structure.
However, syntagmatic criteria lead to a better understanding of the structure and above all the meaning of complex nouns. Let us refer back to the definitions given previously 2.3 on defining a word (in English):
and finally, to ensure a complete chain of definitions:
These definitions suggest new questions about how meanings of complex words are constituted:
The question which is easiest (but not easy!) to answer is the first, perhaps the second, and maybe even the third.
Task:
Pick a text from the web (or elsewhere) and answer the first three questions, giving examples from the text corpus to illustrate your answers.
In the case of words, is simplest case is a word with a stem which is a root, i.e. a lexical morpheme, and maybe an inflection.
The question arises, if an inflection is added to a noun, what is the meaning of the inflection, e.g. for [NUMBER=plural] in English?
German affixes are slightly more agglutinative than English affixes. Note the two endings which may occur in the plural, for example: `to/for dogs' Hund+e+n, where in this context "e" means [NUMBER=plural] and "n" means [CASE=dative].
Task:
Find a German text on the web and discuss the kinds and meaning of the inflections of German nouns, giving examples from the text corpus to illustrate your answers.
The most interesting question is, however, the fourth. Recursive definitions often sound circular until you get used to them and realise that they are not circular because a simplest case where the recursion stops is always defined.
Task:
A transparent compound is a compound whose meaning is a function of its parts.
A nontransparent compound is a compound whose meaning is a not a function of its parts, but idiosyncratic (though part of the meaning might be determined by the meaning of a part).
There are three main kinds of transparent compound:
Task: