next up previous contents
Next: Discussion of project results Up: 23 03 56 ENGLISCH Previous: Linguistic aspects of layout

Project: Production of a multilingual multimedia hypertext

Project: Requirements specification of a hypertext

In linguistic terms, a hypertext is a complex sign, and the requirements specification of a hypertext is a characterisation of the function of this sign.

In simple terms, the requirements specification discusses points such as the following:

From a linguistic point of view, the requirements specification would consist of an analysis of the functions of the hypertext from any of the following points of view:

Phases in specifying the requirements:

  1. The first part of the requirements specification phase may consist of brainstorming, collection of relevant sources of information, interviews with users;
  2. the second part may consist of a systematisation of the requirements specification in terms of relevance, or logical dependencies of various aspects on other aspects.

Project: Design of a hypertext

The design phase discusses points such as the following:

  1. Document semantics: the contents part of the requirements specification
  2. Document structure:
  3. Document realisation: layout and rendering as a hypertext

Project: Implementation of a hypertext

  1. Use the appropriate document styles (Title, Heading 1, Standard, etc.) and define them according to your own purposes
  2. Use the appropriate document objects, and define them according to your own purposes (lists, tables)

Project: Evaluation of a hypertext

The main question in the evaluation of a hypertext is simply - "Is this a good hypertext?" Of course this begs a number of questions. There is no absolute notion of `goodness': a value judgment of this kind can be made on any number of dimensions. A `good mother' is not necessarily a `good cricket player', and vice versa...

There are two related but different dimensions of evaluation:

  1. Functional evaluation: Does the hypertext fulfil your requirements specification?
  2. Structural evaluation: Is the document correctly implemented? You can check this by generating different formats, e.g. standard Word DOC, HTML, and testing it with different viewing software, e.g. Word, a web browser.

You can find out more about the different aspects and methods of evaluation by checking the handbook:
Gibbon, Dafydd, Inge Mertins, Roger Moore, eds. (2000). Handbook of Multimodal & Spoken Dialogue Systemws: Resources, Terminology & Product Evaluation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.


next up previous contents
Next: Discussion of project results Up: 23 03 56 ENGLISCH Previous: Linguistic aspects of layout

Dafydd Gibbon, Thu Feb 15 15:07:15 MET 2001