next up previous contents
Next: Case framesrole frames Up: Verb categories Previous: Syntactic subcategoriessubcategorisation restrictions,

Semantic subcategories, selectional restrictions, selectional frames

The distinction between the tex2html_wrap_inline362 in John opened the door and This key opened the door can initially be made in terms of properties of the SUBJECT; for completeness, similar characterisation of the other complements can be made:
open <tex2html_wrap_inline366> The door opened.
<tex2html_wrap_inline372, tex2html_wrap_inline366> John opened the door.
<tex2html_wrap_inline366, tex2html_wrap_inline366> This key opened the door.
<tex2html_wrap_inline366, tex2html_wrap_inline390> The door opened with this key.
<tex2html_wrap_inline372, tex2html_wrap_inline366, tex2html_wrap_inline390> John opened the door with this key.

The main distinctions are captured; however, the difference between the two inanimate NPs in this key opened the door, and its relatedness to the door opened with this key is still not captured.

Reference: The earliest treatment of selectional frames in distinction to (strict) subcategorisation frames is in:
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridgd, Mass.: MIT Press.



Dafydd Gibbon
Sun May 25 21:36:37 MET DST 1997